News
Tangale: The Father Danladi Is Claiming Was Infertile – Stakeholders
By Henry Gabriel
In a strong display of opposition, Tangale stakeholders in Gombe State have firmly rejected the imposition of Mal Danladi Sanusi Maishanu as their paramount ruler by Governor Inuwa Yahaya, stating that the man in question is not a true Tangale, as his claimed father was known to be infertile and never fathered a child.
The stakeholders, in a joint statement, emphasized the importance of clarifying to the public that Mal. Danladi Sanusi Maishanu does not possess Tangale lineage.
Elder Tele K. Elsa, Secretary of the Tangale Elders Forum, Mr. Reuben A. Bauna, Secretary of the Tangale Community Development Association, Major B. S. Uba (rtd), Secretary of the Kwagam Tangale Socio-Cultural Association, and Mr. Lamela Umaru Lakorok, Secretary of the Tangale Community Overseas, collectively stated that Mal. Danladi does not carry Tangale blood.
“He cannot be Mai Tangale, and the Tangale people will continue to reject him,” the statement read.
The stakeholders further emphasized their knowledge of the ancestry of the Maiyamba family, stating that Danladi is not a descendant. They challenged anyone with a contrary opinion to provide evidence supporting their claim.
The group also shed light on the history of Mal. Danladi’s claimed father, Mal. Maishanu Maiyamba, who was known to be infertile and never had any children.
They stated that it was widely known in Tangale land that Mal. Maishanu, a health inspector, had multiple wives who were unable to bear him a child.
The stakeholders revealed that Mal. Danladi’s mother arrived in Billiri town with a daughter and a five-month-old pregnancy.
Despite pressure from family members and relatives, Mal. Maishanu rejected both the mother and the pregnancy due to his infertility.
The group clarified that Mal. Danladi was not born in Maishanu’s house but in the house of Baba Majidadi Lakwas.
They also highlighted the fact that Mal. Danladi had different names and aliases throughout his life, eventually settling with the name Sanusi, which he adopted as a surname.
The stakeholders maintained that his biological father was unknown and that he was not born into the Tangale tribe.
The stakeholders expressed their disappointment with the Maiyamba ruling family for their silence on the matter and for allowing Mal. Danladi to contest for the stool of Mai Tangale under their family flag, despite knowing he is not one of them.
They questioned Governor Inuwa Yahaya’s motives for forcefully imposing a non-Tangale man as Mai Tangale, contrary to the culture and wishes of the Tangale people.
The Tangale stakeholders called on Governor Yahaya to respect the decision of their kingmakers and stop parading Mal. Danladi as Mai Tangale.
They demanded that the Billiri Local Government Council and the Gombe State Council of Chiefs also refrain from recognizing him as the traditional ruler.
The stakeholders urged the National Security Adviser and the security agencies to cease their involvement in the matter, as they had assisted in creating the situation.
The group asserted that the majority of their kingmakers had selected Dr. Musa Idris Maiyamba, a true Tangale man from the royal bloodline, as the 16th Mai Tangale.
They emphasized that according to their culture, they did not require anyone’s permission to affirm Dr. Musa Idris Maiyamba as their paramount ruler.
The Tangale stakeholders concluded their statement by stating that the Tangale people remain steadfast and resolute in their stance.
They affirmed their knowledge of their history and asserted that no one can rewrite it.
News
Lawyers Storm National Assembly To Demand Constitutional Take-Over Of Benue, Zamfara Houses of Assembly Over Suspensions
Lawyers numbering over 1,000 who came together from across the country under the Save Benue and Zamfara coalition early this morning petitioned the National Assembly to take over the functions of the Benue and Zamfara State Houses of Assembly.
The coalition, during a peaceful protest on Tuesday at the National Assembly complex, argued that the two houses are unable to perform their constitutional duties due to internal crises and alleged interference by the state governors.
The petition lamented that in Zamfara, 10 lawmakers have been suspended since February last year, on the instructions of Governor Dauda Lawal for raising alarm over the rising insecurity in the state.
Similarly, in Benue, they stated that 13 members of the House of Assembly were suspended for allegedly refusing Governor Hyacinth Alia’s instruction to suspend the Chief Judge of State.
The coalition, led by Barr. Sambari Benjamin, is urging the National Assembly to invoke Section 11(4) of the Constitution, which allows the parliament to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of a state when the House of Assembly is unable to perform its functions.
The lawyers warn that if the situation is not addressed, it may lead to a state of emergency being declared in the two states.
They also expressed concern that the crisis could spread to the National Assembly, potentially threatening its stability.
The coalition therefore requested the Senate President, Senator Godswill Akpabio, to urgently intervene and take over the functions of the Benue and Zamfara State Houses of Assembly to restore democratic rule and stability in the two states.
The petition partly reads: “We write to request the urgent intervention of the Senate under your able leadership to forestall the demise of our democracy in instalments. Following the National Assembly ratifying the state of emergency that President Bola Tinubu proclaimed in Rivers State, we fear that Benue and Zamfara States are on the way to coming under emergency rule unless urgent constitutional steps are taken to remedy the anomalies that exist in both states.
“Our fears are that all of Nigeria’s 36 states would come under emergency rule if the Senate does not step in to demonstrate its commitment to the sustenance and protection of democracy by coming under Section 11 (4) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (as amended) to take over the functions of the two Houses.
“Our request is predicated on Section 11(4) of the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended, which provides that ‘At any time when any House of Assembly of a State is unable to perform its functions by reason of the situation prevailing in that State, the National Assembly may make such laws for the peace, order and good government of that State with respect to matters on which a House of Assembly may make laws as may appear to the National Assembly to be necessary or expedient until such time as the House of Assembly is able to resume its functions; and any such laws enacted by the National Assembly pursuant to this section shall have effect as if they were laws enacted by the House of Assembly of the State: Provided that nothing in this section shall be construed as conferring on the National Assembly power to remove the Governor or the Deputy Governor of the State from office.’
“Allowing this situation to continue will end in President Tinubu proclaiming state of emergency in both places and suspending the assemblies, by which time the National Assembly will no longer be able to take over the functions these states’ house of assembly as constitutionally stipulated. By then the National Assembly can only ratify the emergency rule as would be proclaimed by Mr. President.
“Furthermore, it is a matter of time before the crises that have incapacitated the Benue House of Assembly and Zamfara House of Assembly are introduced to the Senate and indeed the National Assembly, which would make negative history with the President again leveraging the Constitution to dissolve the parliament. The panacea is for the Senate to show the leadership needed at a trying time like this.”
The Federal High Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, banished Favour Kanu, wife of Prince Fineboy Kanu, the younger brother of Nnamdi Kanu for streaming the proceedings of the court live on her Facebook page.
Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), is being prosecuted by the Federal Government for alleged terrorism.
Justice James Omotosho, who gave the order, after Mrs Kanu admitted engaging in the act and apologised to the court, held that she would have been charged for contempt of court.
Although Kanu’s lawyer, Chief Kanu Agabi, SAN, also apologised on her behalf, Justice Omotosho insisted that Mrs Kanu would be barred from three proceedings.
The judge expressed surprise that despite that Mrs Kanu’s phone was confiscated on the last adjourned date when she was caught recording him, she still went ahead to post the video online.
“I want to hear from her. Were you not the one that I took your phone?
“I did not give order to forfeit that phone. I don’t know if she might be a wife to my brother (Nnamdi Kanu),” the judge said.
The judge, who cautioned against any act that could cause delay in the trial, assured all parties in the case that justice would be served. (NAN)
Controversial social media commentator, Mr. Martins Innocent Otse, widely known as VeryDarkMan, has been granted administrative bail by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and will be released upon meeting the required bail conditions.
The anti-corruption agency disclosed that the arrest stemmed from multiple petitions received against the social media figure, alleging involvement in financial misconduct.
This information was shared by the EFCC on its verified Facebook page on Tuesday, where the commission elaborated on the grounds for the arrest.
“The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), in fulfilling its mandate to combat economic and financial crimes, invited Martins Innocent Otse due to a series of petitions concerning various allegations of financial offenses against him,” stated the EFCC.
The agency further noted that Otse failed to respond to several invitations sent to him at his known addresses and through other communication channels.
The EFCC emphasized that the petitions involve serious accusations of financial wrongdoing that warrant attention.
“It is important to acknowledge that the Commission is aware of the numerous unrestrained criticisms directed at its operations by the suspect. While such behavior is regrettable, his arrest was not motivated by these criticisms. The appropriate law enforcement agencies will investigate these matters,” the EFCC clarified.
In executing the arrest and subsequent detention, the commission confirmed that it obtained the necessary remand order. It stated, “He has been granted administrative bail and will be released once all bail conditions are satisfied.”
The EFCC appreciates the public’s interest in its operations and welcomes the enthusiasm and varied reactions to its activities.
“However, speculations regarding the motives behind our actions should cease. The EFCC must be allowed to perform its duties impartially. Charges will be filed as soon as investigations are concluded,” the Commission stated.