Connect with us

News

UN Seeks ‘Perilous Precedent’ In UK’s Rwanda Deportation Law

Published

on

By Abubakar Yunusa
Heads of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) on Tuesday called on Britain to reconsider its new law facilitating the deportation of asylum seekers to Rwanda.

The bill passed on Monday significantly restricted the possibility of resisting deportation even if migrants were exposed to risks in the process.

UNHCR head Filippo Grandi and the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, said in Geneva.

Moreover, people’s specific individual circumstances may not be adequately examined before deportation contrary to international humanitarian law, they noted.

“By shifting responsibility for refugees, reducing the UK’s courts’ ability to scrutinise removal decisions, restricting access to legal remedies in the UK.

“And also limiting the scope of domestic and international human rights protections for a specific group of people.

“This new legislation seriously hinders the rule of law in the UK and sets a perilous precedent globally,’’ said Türk.

It is particularly worrying that the law allows the government to ignore decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, according to their statement.

The British House of Lords, as the second chamber of Parliament, approved the bill on Tuesday night after prolonged opposition.

In doing so, the UK declared the East African country a safe third country, which enables the deportation there of asylum seekers.

The law is intended to deter people from making the dangerous journey to Britain across the English Channel in small dinghies and also destroy the business model of people smugglers.

ALSO READ:  Young Parliamentarians Commit to Ensuring Good Governance For Nigeria's Future
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Lift wanted tag on socialite, Aisha Achimugu – Coalition urges EFCC

Published

on

A coalition of youth organisations has urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to reconsider its wanted tag on socialite, Dr Aisha Sulaiman Achimugu, OFR.

The organisations, Niger Delta Youth Council for Good Governance and Middle Belt Youth Stakeholders’ Initiative said this in a joint press statement they issued on Thursday in Abuja.

According to them, the declaration of Achimugu wanted by the anti-corruption agency came to them as a rude shock.

The joint statement was signed by Comrade Emma Niboro and Ali Ameh for Niger Delta Youth Council for Good Governance and Middle Belt Youth Stakeholders’ Initiative, respectively.

They described Achimugu as a dedicated friend of the youths, who had always shown commitment to the welfare and care of the downtrodden.

According to the youth coalition, “we know the Chairman of the EFCC, Mr. Ola Olukoyede, as a man who came with utmost zeal to sanitize the agency. He has already demonstrated this and we are proud of his achievements so far.

“However, we urge him to resist pressure from politicians, which is a plague that has dwarfed EFCC for several years of its existence.

“The commission had hitherto remained a tool for politicians to undue their perceived political foes and this has always rubbed off on the credibility of the agency.

“The case of Achumugu doesn’t appear to be different in any way, as the haste with which she was declared wanted showed there is a hand of Esau and voice of Jacob.

“Our appeal is that the commission should withdraw the wanted tag on her and give her ample time to report to the commission, as she has never been indicted of any offence whether in Nigeria or outside the country.”

ALSO READ:  NSCDC arrests 4 illegal miners in Anambra

While noting that Achimugu is a global figure, they added that they can always vouch for her integrity.

“We know her, she has always been of immense help to the youths and other members of the society.

“Her closeness to certain politicians should not be used as a tool to persecute or harass her,” the youths further stated.

Continue Reading

News

Appea Court Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Abure As The National Chairman Of LP – Supreme Court

Published

on

The Supreme Court has overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision that recognised Julius Abure as the National Chairman of the Labour Party (LP). In a decisive ruling, a five-member panel declared that the Court of Appeal lacked the legal authority to determine the party’s leadership matters.

In a unanimous verdict, the highest court in the land stated that the Court of Appeal had no jurisdiction over the matter. The panel observed that since the case revolved around the internal leadership structure of the Labour Party, it fell outside the jurisdiction of the courts.

The ruling reinforced the long-standing principle that leadership disputes within political parties should be resolved internally, rather than through judicial intervention.

The Supreme Court stressed that leadership struggles within political parties are purely internal matters. According to legal principles, courts should not interfere in such issues, as they fall under the party’s constitution and governance framework. By upholding this legal doctrine, the apex court reaffirmed that political parties must settle their leadership crises independently.

The Supreme Court upheld the appeal lodged by Senator Nenadi Usman and a fellow appellant, ruling that their claims were valid. Their appeal challenged the earlier judgment, arguing that it was flawed due to jurisdictional overreach. After thorough legal scrutiny, the Supreme Court found merit in their argument and ruled in their favour.

The legal battle also involved a cross-appeal filed by supporters of Julius Abure, who sought to challenge the decision against their leader. However, the Supreme Court dismissed this cross-appeal, declaring it unsubstantiated and lacking merit. The ruling effectively ended the legal contest over the Labour Party’s chairmanship, cementing the judiciary’s stance on non-interference in party leadership disputes.

ALSO READ:  NSCDC arrests 4 illegal miners in Anambra
Continue Reading

News

Bitcoin Drops to $82,000 After Trump’s Tariff Announcement

Published

on

Bitcoin experienced sharp fluctuations following President Donald Trump’s April 2 tariff announcement, initially surging to $88,000 before dropping to $82,000.

By April 3, it stabilized around $83,000, with the broader crypto market down over 4%. Major altcoins like Ethereum and Solana also declined over 6%, hitting multi-month lows.

Analysts see the tariff news as reducing market uncertainty, potentially attracting institutional investors.

Despite higher-than-expected rates, experts believe the clarity could help Bitcoin regain momentum toward $90,000. Bitcoin ETFs, led by BlackRock, recorded $218 million in inflows on April 2, reversing prior outflows.

Kraken’s Thomas Perfumo challenged the idea that institutional interest stabilizes crypto, emphasizing that volatility signals demand for a scarce asset.

Some analysts viewed the sell-off as an overreaction to trade policy concerns, highlighting Bitcoin’s resilience as a store of value.

With ETFs showing strong demand, Bitcoin’s price may stabilize and rise, though market participants remain cautious, monitoring trade policies and economic conditions.

ALSO READ:  NSCDC arrests 4 illegal miners in Anambra
Continue Reading