Connect with us

National

JAMN Slams El-Rufai Over Intervention in Ribadu-Najatu Dispute

Published

on

The Joint Action Movement of Nigeria (JAMN), on Friday, criticized former Kaduna State Governor Nasir El-Rufai for his intervention in the ongoing dispute between National Security Adviser Nuhu Ribadu and Hajiya Najatu Mohammed.

The group further accused El-Rufai of attempting to rewrite history, saying that after inflicting hardship and humiliation on a large section of Kaduna State’s population, he now seeks to reinvent himself as a champion of the North.

In a statement signed by Chairman Lawal Sani Ningi and Secretary Deborah Kantiok, JAMN described El-Rufai’s remarks as reckless, misleading, and self-serving, accusing him of prioritizing political manipulation over truth and accountability.

At the center of the controversy are serious allegations made by Najatu Mohammed in a viral video, where she claimed that Ribadu, during his tenure as EFCC Chairman, sought to block the political aspirations of Bola Tinubu, George Akume, and Orji Kalu, whom she described as Nigeria’s most corrupt governors. Ribadu has since demanded evidence, warning of legal consequences for unverified accusations.

He said: “El-Rufai’s intervention is particularly alarming given the backdrop of his own legal troubles. Reports indicate that he is facing pending accusations of financial irregularities from the Kaduna State House of Assembly.

“His public support for Najatu Mohammed appears strategically timed, potentially serving as a distraction from his own legal challenges. By aligning himself with a controversial claim, El-Rufai risks further eroding his credibility and prioritizing political expediency over truth and accountability.

“The Joint Action Movement of Nigeria is deeply concerned about the implications of El-Rufai’s actions, which reflect a broader pattern of behavior marked by betrayal, inconsistency, and a lack of ethical integrity.

ALSO READ:  Police, others wait for protesters at Gani Fawehinmi Park

“His tenure as governor of Kaduna State was marred by accusations of dehumanization and the arbitrary dismissal of individuals, actions that starkly contradict his self-proclaimed role as a defender of the “cultured North.” Such conduct is not that of a statesman but of a cynical politician seeking to manipulate public opinion for personal gain.

“The embarrassment of El-Rufai seeking a ministerial appointment, only to have his candidacy withdrawn amid ethical concerns, underscores his refusal to accept accountability for his questionable record.

“Instead of reflecting on his past actions, he has chosen a path of confrontation and unsubstantiated claims against the very administration that deemed him unfit for public service. This behavior reeks of bitterness and desperation, as he attempts to regain relevance through manufactured outrage.

“El-Rufai’s self-proclaimed role as a messiah for the North is particularly troubling. After inflicting hardship and humiliation on a significant segment of Kaduna State’s population, he now attempts to reposition himself as a benevolent leader.

“This cynical attempt to rewrite history and evade responsibility is a clear demonstration of his lack of integrity. The people of Kaduna State, and indeed the wider Nigerian public, are not easily deceived. The memory of his governance and its consequences remains vivid, rendering his current posturing hollow and unconvincing.

“Nasir El-Rufai’s intervention in the Ribadu-Mohammed dispute epitomizes his broader political character, characterized by a lack of integrity, a penchant for betrayal, and a demonstrable inability to engage in constructive dialogue.

“His history of inconsistent allegiances, documented ethical failings, and inflammatory rhetoric disqualifies him from offering any meaningful commentary on matters of public importance. His attempts to position himself as a moral authority or defender of any group should be treated with skepticism, given his demonstrable lack of credibility and the weight of his past actions.

ALSO READ:  Dr. Abubakar Audi's Visionary Leadership: NSCDC Excels in Protecting National Assets Amidst End Bad Governance Protests"

“The Joint Action Movement of Nigeria urges the public to critically assess El-Rufai’s pronouncements, viewing them not as insightful analysis but as the desperate cries of a discredited figure clinging to irrelevance.

“We call upon the citizens of Nigeria to focus on substantive issues and engage in discourse that is grounded in truth and accountability, unburdened by the noise of self-serving rhetoric. The future of our nation demands leaders who prioritize integrity and responsibility over personal ambition.”

National

IMF urges Nigeria to focus on most vulnerable while stabilising economy

Published

on

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has urged the Nigerian government to accompany its economic stabilisation policies with targeted social welfare transfers to support the most vulnerable populations.

IMF Director of Communications, Julie Kozack, made this known during a routine press conference at the IMF headquarters in Washington, DC, on Thursday.

Kozack acknowledged the challenges many Nigerians faced and stressed the importance of prioritising support for vulnerable households.

“The authorities’ policies to stabilise the economy and promote growth are welcomed.

“However, they must be accompanied by targeted social transfers to support the most vulnerable populations. We recognise the extremely difficult situation that many Nigerians face,” she said.

She said that completing the rollout of cash transfers to vulnerable households and improving domestic revenue mobilisation should be key priorities for Nigeria.

Kozack also announced that IMF staff would visit Nigeria next week to prepare for the 2025 Article IV Consultation.

News Agency of Nigeria (NAN), reports that under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF conducts annual bilateral discussions with member countries.

As part of this process, a staff team visits the country, gathers economic and financial data, and engages with officials on economic policies and developments.(NAN)

ALSO READ:  Police, others wait for protesters at Gani Fawehinmi Park
Continue Reading

National

Tinubu Distorting Democracy, Weaponising Judiciary, Others – Prof Udenta

Published

on

The founding National Secretary of the Alliance for Democracy, Prof Udenta Udenta, on Thursday, accused the Bola Tinubu Presidency of dismantling democratic values and weaponing the judiciary, and the 1999 Constitution (as amended) against Nigerians.

Prof Udenta, a distinguished fellow of the Abuja School of Social and Political Thought, said the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara of Rivers State was a distortion of democratic institutions by the Tinubu government.

“The system that should protect democratic governance, you are weaponising them; the judiciary, the apparatus of the state, you are distorting, diluting and transmogrifying them in a way and manner that is shutting down democratic conversations.

“That is what you find as the legacy of the Bola Tinubu president and his political agents,” Prof Udenta said on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily programme.

The scholar said dismantling democratic principles isn’t by shooting guns but by misusing democratic instruments like the constitution and the judiciary.

“When you abandon the foundational norms of democracy and then you begin to use instruments you acquired in power to dismantle the guardrails that govern the democratic system, then democracy dies.

“It is not by firing a shot that democracy dies or crumbles, it is leveraging the guardrails like the constitution, like what was done in Rivers State, to abort democratic rules,” he said.
The scholar also accused Rivers State Administrator, Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd) of dismantling the levers of democracy with his suspension of all political appointees in the oil-rich state.

“You find the sole administrator strutting around Port Harcourt, dismantling democratic infrastructure,” he said.

ALSO READ:  Dumebi :No need for constitutional changes — we haven't fully utilized the current one

Prof Udenta described what is practised in Rivers State as a “hybrid regime which is a part of competitive authoritarianism” being deployed to “manacle the spirit of a nation and abort democratic institutions at all levels” including labour unions, media houses, political parties, and civil societies.

Prof Udenta regretted that the quality of the lives of Nigerians in the last two years has so depreciated. He lamented that there is widespread hunger and poverty in the land with escalating food inflation usurping the income of average Nigerians.

“There is poverty in the land, there is hunger everywhere, inflation is soaring, criminality and terrorism and all manners of insecurity pervade the nation, and the government is bemused like this current one,” he said.

Continue Reading

National

Bill To Create Prime Minister Office Passes Second Reading At Reps

Published

on

A bill for an Act to alter the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, to provide for the office of the Prime Minister as head of government and the office of President as head of state and to provide for a framework for the mode of election to the said offices, has passed second reading in the House of Representatives.

It is among 32 Constitution amendment bills that scaled second reading in the House of Representatives on Thursday.

Also among the bills is a bill for an Act to alter the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, to provide for specific seats for women in the national assembly and state houses of assembly.

Another is a bill for an Act to alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, to reduce the lengthy period for determination of pre-election petition matters and provide for the establishment of pre-election tribunals for pre-election matters and regulate the process of suspending a member of the national assembly from legislative duties.

A bill for an Act to alter the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, to review the requirements that qualifies persons to be elected as president and vice-president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, governors and deputy governor, passed second reading as well.

A bill for an act to alter the provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, to review the status of the Federal Capital Territory as regards the election of the president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and bills for the creation of Wan State and Gobir State also passed second reading.

ALSO READ:  Dr. Abubakar Audi's Visionary Leadership: NSCDC Excels in Protecting National Assets Amidst End Bad Governance Protests"

This brings the total number of Constitution Amendment Bills passed so far through second reading to 113.

Continue Reading