Connect with us

News

U.S. judge temporarily blocks Trump’s order restricting birthright citizenship

Published

on

A federal judge blocked Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday from implementing the Republican president’s executive order curtailing the right to automatic birthright citizenship in the United States, calling it “blatantly unconstitutional.”

Seattle-based U.S. District Judge John Coughenour issued a temporary restraining order at the urging of four Democratic-led states – Washington, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon – preventing the administration from enforcing the order.

Trump signed the order on Monday, his first day back in office.

The judge, an appointee of Republican former President Ronald Reagan, dealt the first legal setback to the hardline policies on immigration that are a centerpiece of Trump’s second term as president.

“Obviously we’ll appeal,” Trump said of Coughenour’s ruling.

Trump’s executive order had directed U.S. agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of children born in the United States if neither their mother nor father is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident.

“I am having trouble understanding how a bar member could state unequivocally that this order is constitutional,” the judge told a U.S. Justice Department lawyer defending Trump’s order.

“It just boggles my mind,” he added.

The states argued that Trump’s order violated the right enshrined in the citizenship clause of the U.S. Constitution’s 14th Amendment that anyone born in the United States is a citizen.

“I’ve been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one.

“This is a blatantly unconstitutional order,” Coughenour said of Trump’s policy.

Coughenour’s order, announced following a short hearing in a packed courtroom with other judges watching, prevents Trump’s policy from being enforced nationwide for 14 days while the judge considers whether to issue a long-lasting preliminary injunction.

ALSO READ:  Economy: Saving for future use almost impossible – FCT residents

He will hear arguments over whether to do so on Feb. 6.

Under Trump’s order, any children born in the United States after Feb. 19 whose mother and father are not American citizens or lawful permanent residents would be subject to deportation and would be prevented from obtaining Social Security numbers, various government benefits, and the ability as they get older to work lawfully.

“Under this order, babies being born today don’t count as U.S. citizens,” Washington state Assistant Attorney General Lane Polozola, referring to Trump’s policy, told the judge during the hearing.

Justice Department lawyer Brett Shumate argued that Trump’s action was constitutional and called any judicial order blocking it “wildly inappropriate.”

But before Shumate had even finished responding to Polozola’s argument, Coughenour said he had signed the temporary restraining order.

The Justice Department plans to file papers next week to urge the judge not to issue a longer injunction, Shumate said.

A Justice Department spokesperson said it plans to “vigorously defend” Trump’s order.

“We look forward to presenting a full merits argument to the court and the American people, who are desperate to see our nation’s laws enforced,” the spokesperson said.

Washington Attorney General Nick Brown, a Democrat, said he sees no reason to expect that the Justice Department would succeed in overturning Coughenour’s ruling on appeal, even if the matter goes to the U.S. Supreme Court, whose 6-3 conservative majority includes three justices appointed by Trump.

“You are an American citizen if you were born on American soil – period,” Brown said, adding: “Nothing that the president can do will change that.”

ALSO READ:  BBNaija All Stars: Ike Gets Strike For Vandalising Ilebaye's Clothes

More than 150,000 newborn children would be denied citizenship annually if Trump’s order is allowed to stand, according to the Democratic-led states.

Since Trump signed the order, at least six lawsuits have been filed challenging it, most of them by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states.

Democratic state attorneys general have said that understanding the Constitution’s citizenship clause was cemented 127 years ago when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that children born in the United States to non-citizen parents are entitled to American citizenship.

The 14th Amendment, adopted in 1868 following the U.S. Civil War, overturned the Supreme Court’s notorious 1857 Dred Scott decision that had declared that the Constitution’s protections did not apply to enslaved Black people.

In a brief filed late on Wednesday, the Justice Department called the order an “integral part” of Trump’s efforts “to address this nation’s broken immigration system and the ongoing crisis at the southern border.”

Thirty-six of Trump’s Republican allies in the U.S. House of Representatives on Tuesday separately introduced legislation to restrict automatic citizenship to only children born to American citizens or lawful permanent residents. (Reuters/NAN)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

FCTA working to reduce maternal, infant mortality – Secretary

Published

on

The Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) says it has taken steps toward reducing indices of maternal and child mortality in the territory.

The Mandate Secretary, Health Services and Environment Secretariat, FCTA, Dr Adedolapo Fasawe, stated this during the inauguration of the Maternal Mortality Reduction Innovation and Initiatives (MAMII) programme in Abuja on Monday.

The inauguration of the MAMII programme was part of activities to commemorate the 2025 World Health Day, with the theme “Healthy Beginnings, Hopeful Futures.”

Fasawe, who said that maternal and child mortality are majorly due to complications at childbirth, noted that the FCT Administration introduced health insurance cover for pregnant women and their newborn to curb mortality.

This, she said, was in line with the administration’s zero tolerance to maternal and infant mortality.

She added that there were also specific programmes that the Federal Government had put in place toward addressing not only the health of the populace, but also for pregnant women and newborn.

According to her, the measure will ensure timely and proper healthcare for pregnant mothers and newborn.

She said “it is a policy of this administration that when a woman has health insurance, her pregnancy and delivery would be covered by the insurance policy.

“In addition, the baby, when delivered, is entitled to a health insurance cover in the first year of his/her life.

“In simple English, delivery is free, and childcare is free.”

She said that the FCTA had set up a health insurance desk in all its facilities and urged pregnant women to register to access free health services.

ALSO READ:  KDSG reviews policy on food, nutrition

Fasawe added that the MAMII programme was also organised to educate pregnant women on what President Bola Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda has put in place to reduce maternal and newborn mortality.

She explained that the 2025 theme means a new and bright beginning for pregnant women and a hopeful future for the kids they would give birth to.

Dr Dayo Adeyanju, the National Coordinator of the MAMII programme, said all pregnancies must be well taken care of to achieve healthy beginning under the programme.

Adeyanju added that children must live beyond five years to ensure a hopeful future.

He noted that “President Bola Tinubu has directed the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Prof. Muhammad Pate, to ensure every pregnancy translates to a healthy baby.”

According to him, there is no reason why pregnancy should be a death sentence.

He explained that the MAMII programme is to counter delays that lead to maternal death, either delay in seeking healthcare or delay in receiving healthcare, including reaching healthcare facility.

He explained that part of the strategy was to mobilise women from communities to visit health facilities and ensure they have good transportation.

The coordinator added that caesarean services would also be accessed free at tertiary facilities, which would be extended to general hospitals.

“We are also ensuring that primary and secondary facilities are revitalised to deliver pregnant women safely.

“An accord was signed by the federal, state and local governments. We are all working together to ensure that no woman loses her life while bringing another life.

ALSO READ:  2 dead, 12 injured in Umuahia-Enugu Expressway accident

“We are also leveraging President Tinubu’s political will to ensure that every pregnancy is safe and every child lives beyond the age of five.”

Adeyanju said that the programme would be extended to all parts of the country.

For sustainability, he said every pregnant woman enlisted would be linked to a functional facility where she would access mama kits and a voucher to be transported to the facility for delivery.

On his part, Dr Walter Mulombo, the Country Representative, World Health Organisation, said that for children to be born healthy, a pregnant mother needs to attend at least four antenatal clinic visits.

Mulombo added that pregnant women also need to take measures and seek care when ill.

He lauded the Federal Government health insurance scheme, saying “it helps pregnant women to overcome the financial challenges of accessing healthcare.

“When children are born, they need to get immunised and they need to get all the vaccines they need to grow healthy.

“When they become adolescents, they need to have access to adolescent care, including for girls, access to HPV vaccine to prevent cervical cancer.”

The WHO country representative also said that the MAMII programme would be a year-long campaign and urged government to continue to invest in healthcare. (NAN)

Continue Reading

News

U.S. President Donald Trump holds up a chart of “reciprocal tariffs”

Published

on

US President Donald Trump on Monday threatened huge additional tariffs on imports from China if Beijing did not withdraw its retaliation plans, adding that Washington would begin talks with other countries that want negotiations.

The fresh action would stack on an already steep US rate taking effect Wednesday, the White House told AFP, bringing the total figure to a prohibitive level.

“If China does not withdraw its 34 percent increase above their already long term trading abuses by tomorrow, April 8th, 2025, the United States will impose ADDITIONAL Tariffs on China of 50 percent, effective April 9th,” Trump said in a Truth Social post.

As part of a broader plan to impose “reciprocal” tariffs on countries with which the United States has large trade deficits, Trump last week unveiled a 34 percent additional tariff on China, taking effect Wednesday.

Beijing’s counter tariff matches Washington’s figure, and is set to kick in on April 10. These will stack on existing Chinese duties too.

The world’s second biggest economy has also issued other countermeasures, including export controls on rare earth elements.

Since returning to the presidency, Trump has imposed 20 percent added duties on Chinese imports over Beijing’s alleged role in the fentanyl supply chain.

With the incoming 34 percent rate and new 50 percent threat, the total additional rate this year could hit 104 percent, the White House told AFP.

The White House added that this new rate piles on existing tariffs from Trump’s first presidency, which former president Joe Biden largely kept in place and added to in targeted sectors.

ALSO READ:  Christmas: Commuters groan over gridlocks, high fares in South East

Trump took aim at Beijing’s economic practices on social media Monday, criticizing its “non-monetary tariffs” and “illegal subsidization of companies.”

He added that “all talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated.”

But “negotiations with other countries, which have also requested meetings, will begin taking place immediately,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform.

AFP

Continue Reading

News

INEC commended for transparent process in Natasha’s recall moves by constituents

Published

on

The Transition Monitoring Group (TMG) has commended the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) for ensuring a transparent process on the moves by some constituents to recall the suspended Sen. Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan from the Senate.

Chairman of TMG, Mr Auwal Rafsanjani, gave the commendation at a news conference on Monday on Abuja.

Rafsanjani particularly praised the commission for the way and manner it counted the signatures collected from Kogi Central Senatorial District being represented by Akpoti-Uduaghan in the senate.

“TMG is satisfied with the conduct of INEC, its dedication and commitment to a transparent process which upholds constitutionalism and due process.

“This is a clear demonstration of the functionality of democracy, when democratic institutions uphold the rule of law rather than becoming tools for the alignment of political interests of a few people in power,” he said.

Rafsanjani urged the senate to recognise the huge gender imbalance in the upper legislative chamber and continue to present itself as an institution that encourages more women participation in politics

According to him, recalling a lawmaker is predicated on misrepresentation, under-performance and misconduct, not a tool for politicians to wield at will.

He called on INEC to verify and authenticate the Voter Identification Number (VIN) used to carry out Akpoti-Uduaghan’s recall process through BVAS.

Rafsanjani claimed that personal data of citizens of Kogi Central senatorial district were harvested and used without their consent, saying this was against the provisions of Data Protection Act

He, therefore, called on National Data Protection Commission to carry out necessary investigation on this to assure Nigerians that their personal data would be protected as envisaged by the law.

ALSO READ:  2 dead, 12 injured in Umuahia-Enugu Expressway accident

“Where investigations reveal a fraudulent process, the petitioners must be brought to justice to serve as deterrent to those who will be willing to be induced and used by politicians for this kind of charade in the future,” he said. (NAN)

Continue Reading