News
We Shall Not Forget Yunus Ustaz Usman,SAN
By Gloria Mabeiam Ballason Esq
It was only eleven days into the year 2024 when seven senior advocates sued the National Judicial Council, Kogi State Judicial Service Commission, Governor of Kogi State and the Attorney General of the state.
The Suit, FHC/Abj/CS/05/2024, sought a declaration that the choice of Mrs. Amina Bello, the then Governor’s wife, was not based on merit but political and ethnic influence. It therefore sought a mandatory order restraining the appointment of new judicial officers until there was compliance with the laws that mandated merit, competence, sound knowledge of the Law, fairness and equity.
The crusade was led by Yunus Ustaz Usman,
who was called to the Nigerian Bar on 30 July, 1983- a legal career that would see him rise to the pinnacle as Senior Advocate of Nigeria, the fifth person in Northern Nigeria to attain the rank.
Mr. Usman led six other learned silks including Messrs Jibrin Okutepa, Patrick Okolo, Abdullahi Haruna, Reuben Atabo, Shuaibu Aruma and Johnson Usman. It was a departure from commentaries and cries for transparency in the process of appointment of Judges in Nigeria as the top brass lawyers moved talk to walk by inviting the Court to define who to wall in and wall out of the hallowed height of presiding and deciding the affairs and fate of men.
My earliest close interaction with Yunus Ustaz Usman SAN was when Olumuyiwa O. Olowokure Esq, former chairman of the Kaduna Bar, requested that I serve in a Law week committee he was presiding over. O.O. was not the kind of person you turned down. He and the erstwhile Director of Public Prosecutions, Gamaliel Byang Kore Esq, were my first guests on my law radio show and had both graciously accepted to serve on the Medico-Legal Board at House of Justice. Sadly, they both passed away few years apart.
Usman, SAN went over and beyond our committee’s request and solely sponsored the visit to the orphanage and attended the event in person after Jumat prayers. Holding one of the babies, he encouraged the forlorn orphans to keep faith and offered to be their earthly father reminding them that their future was secured as God was already their heavenly father. You know, it is one thing to give gifts but to offer one’s self to bear the weight of strangers, is a higher form of humanity.
Usman SAN, lived in that higher realm with his reputable philanthropy of providing scholarship to indigent students, feeding the hungry, donating to causes and often being a top contributor in cash and knowledge to the Nigerian Bar particularly the Kaduna Branch where he was the Leader.
Speaking of leadership, he moved it from adjective to verb. It was the point of my more personal connect with him:
Sometime in 2018, Professor Ernest Ojukwu, SAN joined the race to lead Africa’s biggest legal bar. It coincided with a time when Nigerians who voted President Muhammadu Buhari had resigned from the initial messianic esteem they held him to. There was hence the need to mitigate the leadership deficit by having a Nigerian Bar that would not only be alive to its core mandate of promoting the rule of law but could save whatever was left of Nigeria’s free fall.
Of the three candidates: Professor Ernest Maduabuchi Ojukwu SAN, Arthur Obi Okafor SAN and Paul Usoro SAN, my choice was the silked professor. He was not only the Deputy Director General of Agbani campus of the Nigerian Law School where he had taught me, but his record with clinical legal education, drive for innovation, aversion for convention and commitment to judicial reforms had sufficiently won me over.
Prof. Ojukwu was also Mr. Usman’s choice but a bloc of the leadership rooted for a different candidate. Although he was the leader of the Kaduna Bar, he was never one to browbeat or overawe lawyers into a decision. He understood agency and respected it.
Usman led Ojukwu’s campaign along with other senior lawyers in Kaduna state like Oladipo Tolani, SAN, Femi Morohundiya (now deceased) and Mark Jacob Nzamah Esq, a former Attorney General of the state. He didn’t stop there; he directed the use of my House of Justice office as the state campaign office and situation room, attended meetings and funded the activities of our candidate’s campaigns – a testament to his humility, ability to be his own man and to disagree without being disagreeable.
During the reign of Nasir Elrufai as ‘Emperor of Kaduna state’, I was perpetually in a legal odyssey advocating and litigating against the myriad abuse of power and violations of rights by the Governor. Usman SAN would often encourage me to keep the fight on with sustained courage and hope. As further support, he went on to submit my curriculum vitae to the Independent National Electoral Commission so I could be included in their legal team and although I was not retained, the magnanimity of this amiable leader tugged at my heartstrings.
Of the kindness I received from him, perhaps none would endure as the gift of his daughter, my gorgeous friend, Nana, whose heart is as generous and kind like her father’s. I hope that along with her big brother, Abdulmutallab and her sister Sadiya all of whom are lawyers, they are able to carry forward the justice ideals their father stood for.
Yunus Ustaz Usman SAN died on 11 September, 2024 – 9 months after the date they filed the case against the politicization of not only his home state’s judiciary but Nigeria’s as a whole. For those who knew him, judicial integrity was often his recurring subject of discourse. He understood that true freedom requires the rule of law and a judicial system in which the rights of some are not secured by the denial of rights to others. In his honour, the Nigerian Bench and Bar must recommit to ensuring justice satisfies the appearance of justice and judicial integrity becomes a state interest of the highest order.
Thank you Yunus Ustaz Usman, SAN for your time, service and leadership. Although the earth is poorer with your passing, history’s vault is richer with your legacy and we shall not forget you.
_*Gloria Mabeiam Ballason Esq is the Principal Partner MIVE LEGALS and the C.E.O. of House of Justice. She may be reached at gloriaballason@houseofjusticeng.com*_
A coalition of youth organisations has urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, to reconsider its wanted tag on socialite, Dr Aisha Sulaiman Achimugu, OFR.
The organisations, Niger Delta Youth Council for Good Governance and Middle Belt Youth Stakeholders’ Initiative said this in a joint press statement they issued on Thursday in Abuja.
According to them, the declaration of Achimugu wanted by the anti-corruption agency came to them as a rude shock.
The joint statement was signed by Comrade Emma Niboro and Ali Ameh for Niger Delta Youth Council for Good Governance and Middle Belt Youth Stakeholders’ Initiative, respectively.
They described Achimugu as a dedicated friend of the youths, who had always shown commitment to the welfare and care of the downtrodden.
According to the youth coalition, “we know the Chairman of the EFCC, Mr. Ola Olukoyede, as a man who came with utmost zeal to sanitize the agency. He has already demonstrated this and we are proud of his achievements so far.
“However, we urge him to resist pressure from politicians, which is a plague that has dwarfed EFCC for several years of its existence.
“The commission had hitherto remained a tool for politicians to undue their perceived political foes and this has always rubbed off on the credibility of the agency.
“The case of Achumugu doesn’t appear to be different in any way, as the haste with which she was declared wanted showed there is a hand of Esau and voice of Jacob.
“Our appeal is that the commission should withdraw the wanted tag on her and give her ample time to report to the commission, as she has never been indicted of any offence whether in Nigeria or outside the country.”
While noting that Achimugu is a global figure, they added that they can always vouch for her integrity.
“We know her, she has always been of immense help to the youths and other members of the society.
“Her closeness to certain politicians should not be used as a tool to persecute or harass her,” the youths further stated.
The Supreme Court has overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision that recognised Julius Abure as the National Chairman of the Labour Party (LP). In a decisive ruling, a five-member panel declared that the Court of Appeal lacked the legal authority to determine the party’s leadership matters.
In a unanimous verdict, the highest court in the land stated that the Court of Appeal had no jurisdiction over the matter. The panel observed that since the case revolved around the internal leadership structure of the Labour Party, it fell outside the jurisdiction of the courts.
The ruling reinforced the long-standing principle that leadership disputes within political parties should be resolved internally, rather than through judicial intervention.
The Supreme Court stressed that leadership struggles within political parties are purely internal matters. According to legal principles, courts should not interfere in such issues, as they fall under the party’s constitution and governance framework. By upholding this legal doctrine, the apex court reaffirmed that political parties must settle their leadership crises independently.
The Supreme Court upheld the appeal lodged by Senator Nenadi Usman and a fellow appellant, ruling that their claims were valid. Their appeal challenged the earlier judgment, arguing that it was flawed due to jurisdictional overreach. After thorough legal scrutiny, the Supreme Court found merit in their argument and ruled in their favour.
The legal battle also involved a cross-appeal filed by supporters of Julius Abure, who sought to challenge the decision against their leader. However, the Supreme Court dismissed this cross-appeal, declaring it unsubstantiated and lacking merit. The ruling effectively ended the legal contest over the Labour Party’s chairmanship, cementing the judiciary’s stance on non-interference in party leadership disputes.
Bitcoin experienced sharp fluctuations following President Donald Trump’s April 2 tariff announcement, initially surging to $88,000 before dropping to $82,000.
By April 3, it stabilized around $83,000, with the broader crypto market down over 4%. Major altcoins like Ethereum and Solana also declined over 6%, hitting multi-month lows.
Analysts see the tariff news as reducing market uncertainty, potentially attracting institutional investors.
Despite higher-than-expected rates, experts believe the clarity could help Bitcoin regain momentum toward $90,000. Bitcoin ETFs, led by BlackRock, recorded $218 million in inflows on April 2, reversing prior outflows.
Kraken’s Thomas Perfumo challenged the idea that institutional interest stabilizes crypto, emphasizing that volatility signals demand for a scarce asset.
Some analysts viewed the sell-off as an overreaction to trade policy concerns, highlighting Bitcoin’s resilience as a store of value.
With ETFs showing strong demand, Bitcoin’s price may stabilize and rise, though market participants remain cautious, monitoring trade policies and economic conditions.